Patrol Commander
Patrol Commander
Why not Hillary, Obama, Edwards or Richardson to serve his country in the military?
Each of them wants to be the next commander in chief. Only a scant two years ago, all John Kerry ever spoke during his own presidential campaign was the way it was a war hero in Vietnam. And all Democrats talked about how Bush was in the Texas Air Guard and went AWOL more in Alabama, and blah, blah, blah, blah. Why are the Democrats suddenly silent on this essential qualification for a wartime president? None of the Democrats announced was a strained time even as security patrol area games, and much less like a soldier. Dio please reread the original question. This was raised by John F. Kerry during the 2004 campaign. Just wanted to remind him.
HA I never realized that its funny ….. how the Democrats flop every minute cap on these issues as "vital." But the answer is: the same reason most Republicans and independents who did not run. roller drum. Because the U.S. taxpayer not pay enough taxes to man and equip an army so large that all U.S. citizens may serve to somewhat arbitrary and hitch required. Large numbers of people who want to bring back the project is called "compulsory service for all citizens," without even giving a yes to the cost. So I'm not their lack of service taking into consideration this election. There are plenty of other reasons to reject those fools at all.
This entry was posted on Saturday, September 4th, 2010 at 12:16 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.